I just finished reading a novel, the first in a series.
The first chapter grabbed me, but by the second or third, some of the scenes began to irritate. They were unrealistic at portraying real-life situations. Likewise, some of the dialogue didn’t work too well for me either. It was artificial, contrived. I certainly could have done better.
Yet the plot was intriguing, so I kept reading.
About midway through, some foreshadowing suggested an implausible ending. Surely, this was a ruse. I imagined two other scenarios I deemed more satisfying. Yet, further foreshadowing pointed towards a conclusion I didn’t want. As I raced towards the finish line, the improbable ending unfolded just as I feared. The book left me unsatisfied. I was irked, bordering on mad.
And I can’t wait to read the second book.
What? Why would I want to read another book in a series when the writing of the first one frustrated me? Quite simply I’ll read more because the author did a wonderful job creating characters I care about. I want to see how their stories unfold. I hope to see them continue to grow as individuals and realize the potential I see for them.
Yes, the writing could have been better, and some readers would not tolerate it. But for light entertainment it was good enough for me; the book was a success.
As writers, we need to make our books as good as we possibly can, while at the same time not becoming paralyzed by the pursuit of perfection – because there’s always something we can improve.
A book can succeed without being perfect.
Peter DeHaan is an author, publisher, and editor. He gives back to the writing community through this blog. Get insider info from his monthly newsletter. Sign up today!